Answer – GE Business Screen

This is the suggested answer to the GE Business Screen exercise on Northwind Industries.

The GE Business Screen: nine cells formed by industry attractiveness and business unit strength

Unit A, Commercial Heat Pumps: Build Selectively

Industry attractiveness comes to (5×0.3) + (3×0.3) + (2×0.2) + (5×0.2) = 1.5 + 0.9 + 0.4 + 1.0 = 3.8 — high. Business unit strength comes to (2×0.4) + (2×0.3) + (4×0.3) = 0.8 + 0.6 + 1.2 = 2.6 — medium. That places Unit A in an attractive industry with a middling position: build selectively. The cost position of 4 is the asset to build on, so the instruction is to pick the segments where low cost wins the order, rather than fund a broad assault on a market where several better-funded rivals have just arrived.

Unit B, Industrial Fasteners: Manage for Earnings

Industry attractiveness comes to (1×0.3) + (4×0.3) + (4×0.2) + (2×0.2) = 0.3 + 1.2 + 0.8 + 0.4 = 2.7 — medium. Business unit strength comes to (5×0.4) + (4×0.3) + (4×0.3) = 2.0 + 1.2 + 1.2 = 4.4 — strong. A strong unit in a middling industry: protect the position, manage for earnings, and do not fund growth the market cannot deliver.

The Harder Question

Unit B scores higher overall, and it is the wrong place for the investment budget. Unit B is where the cash is generated; Unit A is where it should be spent. A strong unit in a slow market cannot convert extra investment into growth, while a medium unit in a growing market still can — provided the spending is focused. This is the point the grid makes and a scorecard would not.

Watch the weightings
Re-weight Unit A’s attractiveness to put competitive intensity at 0.4 and growth at 0.1, keeping the weights summing to one, and the score falls from 3.8 to (5×0.1) + (3×0.3) + (2×0.4) + (5×0.2) = 3.2. The industry is now medium rather than high, the cell changes, and so does the instruction. That sensitivity is the analysis, not a flaw in it — which is why the weightings should be argued over before the scores are read.

The same portfolio decision, judged on two simpler axes, appears in the Boston Matrix exercise.

One of four portfolio analysis models
Boston Matrix  ·  GE Business Screen  ·  Shell Directional Policy Matrix  ·  ADL Matrix
See how they compare, and when the extra detail is worth it, on portfolio analysis.
Written by Marketing Teacher.
Online course · certificate on completion
Study a full online course — and earn a certificate
Three courses that turn the free lessons into ordered modules, written at university Levels 4 to 6, with a short quiz after each.
See the online courses
Teaching this topic?

The slides, worksheet, lesson plan and poster for this lesson are free to download and free to use in your course — no sign-up, no permission needed.

See the teacher resources →