Answer – SWOT Analysis – POWER SWOT

POWER SWOT wheel diagram for prioritising and acting on a SWOT analysis

Why a Plain SWOT List Often Goes Nowhere

Kotler and Armstrong (2018) describe SWOT analysis as part of a wider marketing audit, used for building on strengths, correcting weaknesses and minimizing threats. A plain list of four categories does not, on its own, tell a manager what to actually do next – which is exactly the gap Colorado Ricardo has run into. The POWER SWOT approach addresses this by ranking items by priority and pairing them into specific actions, rather than leaving each item isolated in its own quadrant.

Prioritising and Pairing Colorado Ricardo’s SWOT

Worked example
Strength: spare factory capacity that is currently sitting idle as bike volumes fall.
Threat: the declining market for traditional, non-electric mountain bikes.

Paired together, these two items point directly to a single action: use the idle capacity to manufacture the new e-mountain-bike in-house, rather than either leaving the capacity unused or outsourcing e-bike production to a third party. This is a higher-priority pairing than, say, matching “loyal Colorado following” against “no digital presence,” because it converts an underused asset into the direct answer to the company’s biggest threat, rather than addressing a weakness that has a lower cost of inaction.

Key point
Kotler and Armstrong (2018) emphasise managing weaknesses and threats actively rather than simply recording them. The value of POWER SWOT is in forcing a ranked, paired response – a strength matched against the most pressing threat – so that the SWOT analysis produces a decision Colorado Ricardo can actually act on, not just a longer list.

This prioritised action should be tested against the growth options in the Ansoff’s Matrix exercise.